Four Domains District-Level Sample District

Four Domains CALL (FD CALL) District-Level Summary Report

13 Responses - Report updated 10:05 AM Apr 12, 2023

2.1.10 Recognizing Principals for Innovation, Risk-Taking, and Experimentation

RATING:
3.15
AVG RATING:
3.23
Question:

To what extent does your district recognize principals for innovations that involve taking risks or experimentation toward improved student learning? 

Total Respondents: 13
District leaders discourage principals from taking risks for innovation.
0%
District leaders neither recognize nor discourage principals to takes risks for innovation.
31%
District leaders sometimes recognize principals to take risks for innovation.
38%
District leaders often recognize principals to take risks for innovation.
15%
District leaders almost always recognize principals to take risks for innovation.
15%

2.1.20 Process for Developing Teacher Leadership

RATING:
3.08
AVG RATING:
3.03
Question:

Which of the following best describes the process for developing the leadership of teachers throughout your district?

Total Respondents: 13
A process to develop the leadership of teachers does not exist in our district.
0%
District-level leaders seek teachers willing to take on leadership responsibility and assign them more responsibility.
31%
District-level leaders encourage principals to identify and train teachers for leadership responsibilities.
46%
District-level leaders help school leaders identify the needs of schools and base their teachers leadership training based on those needs.
8%
The development of leadership of teachers is based on school-wide needs and a formal district strategy for school improvement.
15%

2.1.30 Using Shared Definition of Good Teaching for Selecting New Teachers

RATING:
3.15
AVG RATING:
3.42
Question:

Which of the following best describes how school administrators in your district use a shared definition of good teaching to inform the hiring process for new teachers?

Total Respondents: 13
Administrators do not have a shared definition of good teaching to inform the hiring process for new teachers.
8%
Some administrators share a definition of good teaching, but it is not used to inform the hiring process for new teachers.
23%
Some administrators share a definition of good teaching and sometimes use it to inform the hiring process for new teachers.
38%
Some administrators share a definition of good teaching and consistently use it to inform the hiring process for new teachers.
8%
Most administrators share a definition of good teaching and consistently use it to inform the hiring process for new teachers.
23%

2.1.40 Process for Hiring New Principals

RATING:
3.23
AVG RATING:
3.18
Question:

Which of the following best describes the process for hiring new principals in the district?

Total Respondents: 13
The process for hiring principals is unclear or seemingly arbitrary.
8%
Principals are hired based on popularity among stakeholders.
23%
Principals are hired based on perceived school needs and without input from teachers, parents, and/or community members.
31%
Principals are hired based on perceived school needs with input from teachers, parents, and/or community members.
15%
District leaders work with teachers, parents, and community members to review data and identify school needs before principal candidates go through a rigorous process to be hired.
23%

2.1.50 District Role in Process of Poor Teaching Performance

RATING:
3.15
AVG RATING:
4.40
Question:

In the event that a principal has determined that a teacher should be removed from a teaching position due to poor performance, which of the following best describes districts leaders’ roles in this process?

Total Respondents: 13
District leaders work against principals’ recommendation to remove teachers with a record of poor performance.
0%
District leaders address the situation on their own without input from the principal.
23%
District leaders will reassign a teacher with a record of poor performance to another school in the district.
54%
District leaders require principals to meet with them to review case to remove teachers.
8%
District leaders ensure that the teachers with a record of poor performance have received support before they are dismissed from the district.
15%

2.1.60 School Leadership Succession Plans

RATING:
3.23
AVG RATING:
2.28
Question:

To what extent has the district developed formal school leadership succession plans?

Total Respondents: 13
These plans have not been developed.
8%
These plans are currently being developed.
23%
These plans are developed but implemented inconsistently.
31%
These plans are developed and actively used.
15%
These plans are developed, actively used, and proven to be effective.
23%

2.1.88 Principal Feedback: Developing Teacher Leadership

RATING:
2.78
AVG RATING:
3.20
Question:

To what extent do district-level leaders provide regular, ongoing feedback to principals on the following tasks?

Developing teacher leadership

Total Respondents: 13
Not at all
8%
A little
23%
Somewhat
23%
Quite a bit
8%
A great deal
8%
I don't know
31%

2.1.99 Evaluation: Developing Teacher Leadership

RATING:
3.70
AVG RATING:
3.40
Question:

To what extent are the following tasks assessed as part of the principal evaluation?

Developing teacher leadership

Total Respondents: 13
Not at all
0%
A little
8%
Somewhat
15%
Quite a bit
46%
A great deal
8%
I don't know
23%